105,313Records 71,083Employers 85,290Hospitalizations 27,770Amputations 2015-01-01 2025-10-31
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

Employer profile — to

Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

Federal OSHA safety record across 17 records in 7 states.

At a glance

Federal OSHA records for Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation include 17 Severe Injury Reports, 0 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 7 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.

By source

SIR17 records Injuries0 records Inspections0 records

Severe Injury Reports — 17

Date range to

Most recent 17 of 17 reports for this employer.

DODGE CITY, KANSAS —

Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

Event Struck by running powered equipment during maintenance, cleaning, testing

Hospitalized Amputation

SCHUYLER, NEBRASKA —

Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

Event Struck by running powered equipment during maintenance, cleaning, testing

Hospitalized Amputation

NORTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND —

Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation

EventPart of occupant s body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway transport incident

Hospitalized

ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 0

No ITA Form 300/301 injury filings recorded for this employer.

OSHA Inspections — 0

No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.

Recent OSHA citations

No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.

Locations on record

FORT MORGAN, COLORADO
5 records
DODGE CITY, KANSAS
3 records
BUTLER, WISCONSIN
3 records
SCHUYLER, NEBRASKA
2 records
NEWNAN, GEORGIA
1 record
NORTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
1 record
FRIONA, TEXAS
1 record
MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN
1 record

Industries (NAICS codes seen)

NAICS 311611
—
NAICS 311612
—

Sources

This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.