Employer profile — to
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Federal OSHA safety record across 11 records in 5 states.
At a glance
Federal OSHA records for Thermo Fisher Scientific include 8 Severe Injury Reports, 3 Form 300/301 injury filings, and 0 OSHA inspections, spanning 5 states, with incidents dated between and . Aggregated from three OSHA data feeds; per-record detail and source citations are linked below.
By source
Severe Injury Reports — 8
Most recent 8 of 8 reports for this employer.
LENEXA, KANSAS —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
MARIETTA, OHIO —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
NAZARETH, PENNSYLVANIA —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
BOHEMIA, NEW YORK —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
ROCHESTER, NEW YORK —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
ITA Form 300/301 Injury Reports — 3
Most recent 3 of 3 filings for this employer.
Eugene, OR —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Hillsboro, OR —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Eugene, OR —
Thermo Fisher Scientific
OSHA Inspections — 0
No OSHA inspections recorded for this employer.
Recent OSHA citations
No OSHA citations recorded for this employer.
Locations on record
- ALLENTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA
- 3 records
- Eugene, OR
- 2 records
- LENEXA, KANSAS
- 1 record
- BOHEMIA, NEW YORK
- 1 record
- ROCHESTER, NEW YORK
- 1 record
- MARIETTA, OHIO
- 1 record
- Hillsboro, OR
- 1 record
- NAZARETH, PENNSYLVANIA
- 1 record
Industries (NAICS codes seen)
- NAICS 325413
- Viral in-vitro diagnostic test substances manufacturing
- NAICS 333415
- —
- NAICS 334516
- Microscopes, electron and proton, manufacturing
- NAICS 423490
- —
- NAICS 493110
- —
- NAICS 541690
- —
- NAICS 541990
- —
Sources
This profile aggregates federal OSHA records from three published feeds: OSHA Severe Injury Reports, the ITA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data (Form 300/301), and the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspections). Records are matched to this employer by normalized name; small variations in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization collapse to one profile, while materially different legal entities (e.g. parent vs. subsidiary with distinct hyphenated names) remain separate.