Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CRYSTAL FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CRYSTAL FINISHING SYSTEMS, INC. in 333 TROY STREET, RIVER FALLS, WI 54022 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 337054993.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Crystal Finishing Systems, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Crystal Finishing Systems, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
333 TROY STREET
City
RIVER FALLS
State
WI
ZIP
54022
Mailing
2610 ROSS AVENUE, SCHOFIELD, WI 54476
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

18 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D04 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(iv): The inside storage room did not have either a gravity or a mechanical exhaust ventilation system designed to provide a complete change of air within the room at least six times per hour:    (a) Paint Vault; The inside storage room used to store flammable and combustible liquids did not have a gravity or a mechanical exhaust ventilation system capable of providing a complete change of air within the room at least six times per hour.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2640
  • — Z (S) $4400

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1): Spray booth(s) were not constructed of a noncombustible material such as steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry:     (a) B2 Liquid Spray Booth; The spray booth was constructed of a combustible material.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2640
  • — Z (S) $4400

1910.107 G07

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas:    (a) B2 Liquid Spray Booth; A "No smoking" sign was not posted near the spraying area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $2,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:    (a) L3 and L4 Liquid Spray Booths; Electrical boxes adjacent to spray booths were not of approved explosion-proof electrical classification.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2640
  • — Z (S) $4400

1910.107 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable or combustible liquids kept in the vicinity of spraying operations exceeded minimum required for operations and ordinarily exceeded a supply for 1 day or one shift:    (a) B2 Liquid Spray Booth; The spray booth had an excess amount of flammables, about 20 gallons, (i.e. xylene, Polane Reducer 84) stored within the booth exceeding the amount needed for 1 day or one shift.     (b) White Spray Booth; The spray booth had an excess amount of flammables, about 25 gallons, stored within the booth exceeding the amount needed for 1 day or one shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4400

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
May 22, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminantant's chemical state and physical form:    (a) Powder Coating areas; The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace to ensure adequate ventilation and respiratory protection was provided.    (b) Liquid Spray areas; The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace to ensure adequate ventilation and respiratory protection was provided.    (c) Acid Dip; The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace to ensure adequate ventilation and respiratory protection was provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
May 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Powder Painters; Employees required to wear filtering facepiece respirators (3M 8210) were not medically evaluated prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    (a) Powder Painters; Employees required to wear filtering facepiece respirators (3M 8210) were not fit tested prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:    (a) Throughout the facility; Respirators used for powder coating and/or liquid spray painting were not properly stored to protect them from contamination, damage, dust, damaging chemicals, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): Training and information. The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators. The training must be comprehensive, understandable, and recur annually and more often if necessary:    (a) Throughout the facility; Employees required to use respirators while power coating and/or liquid spray painting did not demonstrate proper knowledge of applicable sections of  29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i)-(k)(1)(vi).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards:    (a) Loading/Unloading Area; The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to struckby hazards were wearing protective footwear  while loading/unloading various parts weighing up to  200 pounds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 H02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,300 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide information to the employees on operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present:    (a) Powder Painter and Liquid Painter Operations; Employees were not trained on the hazardous chemicals present in their in work areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $3300

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    (a) Powder Painter and Liquid Painter Operations; Employees were not trained on the health hazards of the chemicals in their work areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Apr 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): Employee training did not include the details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labeling system and the material safety data sheet, and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:    (a) Throughout the facility; Employees were not trained on worksite specific hazard communication topics such as, but not limited to,  the facilities hazard communication program, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers, workplace labeling procedures, and how to obtain and use the appropriate hazard information located on safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): On every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and securely affixed in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.    (a) Shipping Office; The facility utilized the area above the office for storage and no load rating was specified.     (b) Paint Vault; The facility utilized the area above for storage and no load rating was specified.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    (a) Paint Vault; One of the exits was not marked properly with a sign reading "Exit".
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.176 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Feb 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:    (a) Racking near Unloading/Loading Area; A stored pallet on the second rack was not stowed stable and secure against sliding or collapse.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Feb 20, 2013
Abate by
Mar 4, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):    (a) White Spray Booth and area around L4 Liquid Spray Booth; Chemical containers were not properly labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Crystal Finishing Systems, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 337054993.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.