GREEN BAY, WI —
OSHA Inspection: LEGACY FLEXO
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LEGACY FLEXO in 1327 GLORY RD, GREEN BAY, WI 54304 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 345213631.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEGACY FLEXO
- Site address
- 1327 GLORY RD
- City
- GREEN BAY
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54304
- Mailing
- 1327 GLORY RD, GREEN BAY, WI 54304
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323111
- Employees
- 120
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,461 · Current $5,223 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following: (A) A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure; (B) Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy; (C) Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them; and (D) Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures. (a) The employer did not develop specific procedural steps on the purpose of the procedure, specific procedural steps to de-energization, specific procedural steps for application of energy isolating device, specific procedural steps for verification of de-energization when performing tasks such as but not limited to: cleaning and set-up activities on the Fusion C, Fusion C+, Comexi FX2108, ProVision, Chadwick, Comexi F2MP, Fusion C3, Fusion Max, and Fischer & Krecke. (b) The Chadwick energy control procedure developed did not address the natural gas and thermal energy sources exposing employees to burn hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5222.7
- — Z (S) $7461
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee shall receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control. Press Operators and Press Helpers were not trained as an Authorized Lockout/Tagout employee when performing covered activities such as but not limited to set up and cleaning.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): (a) In March 2021 and thereafter, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in change over activities on the printing press equipment. The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to allowing them to remove and change the anilox rollers and plates. The machine was not deenergized prior to the employee engaging in the servicing / maintenance activity. (b) In March 2021 and thereafter, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in cleaning activities on the printing press equipment. The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps or alternative protective measures prior to allowing them to clean the anilox rollers and plates. The machine was not deenergized prior to employee engaging in the servicing/maintenance activity. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lockout/tagout device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)] were not implemented to protect employees from machine hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,461 · Current $5,223 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed. The employer did not perform a periodic inspection to ensure the energy control procedures continued to be implemented properly and that the employees involved were familiar with their responsibilities under those procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5222.7
- — Z (S) $7461
1910.178 L03
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,461 · Current $5,223 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed. The employer did not perform a periodic inspection to ensure the energy control procedures continued to be implemented properly and that the employees involved were familiar with their responsibilities under those procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5222.7
- — Z (S) $7461
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,461 · Current $5,223 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc. (a) On the Comexi FX2108 8 color printing press, employees were exposed to unguarded in-running nip points on Decks 1-4 between the drum and the plate exposing employees to caught in hazards. (b) On the Comexi FX2108 8 color printing press, employees were exposed to unguarded in-running nip points on Decks 5-8 between the plate and anilox roller exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $5222.7
- — I (S) $5222.7
- — Z (S) $7461
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- May 21, 2021
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,461 · Current $5,223 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as�elsewhere required�or permitted�by this�standard, live�parts of�electric equipment�operating at�50 volts�or more�shall be�guarded against�accidental contact by�use of�approved cabinets�or other�forms of�approved enclosures�or by�any of�the following�means as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i)[A] -[D]: (a) In March 2021 and thereafter, the plexiglass cover for the electrical disconnect on the Chadwick did not guard against accidental contact exposing employees to electrical shock hazards. (b) In March 2021 and thereafter, the plexiglass covers for each of the phased electrical wires on the Comexi did not guard against accidental contact exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5222.7
- — Z (S) $7461
More inspections at Legacy Flexo
View Legacy Flexo's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323111)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345213631.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.