Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LIMA STUCCO INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LIMA STUCCO INC in 1920 TATNALL SQUARE BUILDING A-4, VERO BEACH, FL 32966 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341580769.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lima Stucco INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lima Stucco INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LIMA STUCCO INC
Site address
1920 TATNALL SQUARE BUILDING A-4
City
VERO BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32966
Mailing
5580 CURRY FORD ROAD APT. E-4, ORLANDO, FL 32822
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:   a) On or about June 27, 2016, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 to 22 feet when performing stucco work from the basket of aerial lift on the northwest corner of a structure while not wearing a safety harness with a lanyard attached to the basket or boom of that lift.  b) On or about June 27, 2016, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 to 22 feet when performing stucco work from the basket of aerial lift on the southwest corner of a structure while not wearing a safety harness with a lanyard attached to the basket or boom of that lift.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.453 B02 IX

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(ix): Controls for the articulating and extensible boom platforms were not clearly marked to identify their function:  On or about June 27, 2016, at the above addressed site, an employee was exposed to fall hazard when operating an aerial lift which had the controls of that lift covered with stucco material and were not plainly marked as to their function.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  On or about June 27, 2016, at the above addressed site, employees exposed to fall hazards while performing stucco work from aerial lifts were not provided a training program that would enable them to recognize the hazards of falling and those associated with the lifts.   PLEASE NOTE:  CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:  On or about June 27, 2016, at the above addressed site, employees were performing stucco work on site where the employer did not implement and maintain a safety program to address potential hazard that employees could be exposed to while performing their required work.  PLEASE NOTE:  CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 20, 2016
Abate by
Aug 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about June 27, 2016, at the above addressed site, employees were exposed to the hazards associated chemicals including but not limited to gasoline and Portland cement while the employer had not implemented a Hazard Communication Program.  PLEASE NOTE:  CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Lima Stucco INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341580769.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.